Panel of Reviewers
نویسندگان
چکیده
Roger Barker, Honorary Consultant in Neurology, Cambridge Centre of Brain Repair Patrick F Chinnery, Senior Lecturer in Neurogenetics and Honorary Consultant Neurologist, University of Newcastle upon Tyne and Newcastle Hospitals NHS Trust Alasdair Coles, Wellcome Advanced Fellow, Dunn School of Pathology, Oxford and Dept of Neurology, Cambridge Amanda Cox, Research Registrar, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge Tom Foltynie, Neurology Research Registrar, Cambridge Richard Hardie, Consultant Neurologist and Director of Neurorehabilitation, St George's & Atkinson Morley's Hospitals Tim Harrower, Wellcome Clinical Research Fellow and Honorary Neurology Clinical Fellow, Addenbrooke’s Hospital Andrew Larner, Consultant Neurologist, Walton Centre for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Liverpool Simon J G Lewis, Honorary Clinical Research Fellow, Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair Mark Manford, Consultant Neurologist, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, and Bedford Hospital Peter Martin, Consultant Neurologist, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Brian McNamara, SpR in Clinical Neurophysiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Jane Mickelborough, Research Fellow, University of Salford Wojtek Rakowicz, SpR Neurology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge Julian Ray, Neurophysiology SpR, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge John Thorpe, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, and Peterborough Ailie Turton, Research Fellow, Burden Neurological Institute, Bristol Andrew Worthington, Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust, Birmingham
منابع مشابه
'Your comments are meaner than your score': score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review.
In scientific grant peer review, groups of expert scientists meet to engage in the collaborative decision-making task of evaluating and scoring grant applications. Prior research on grant peer review has established that inter-reviewer reliability is typically poor. In the current study, experienced reviewers for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were recruited to participate in one of fo...
متن کاملPeer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملSCALE: Skin Changes at Life's End.
An expert panel was established to formulate a consensus statement on Skin Changes At Life's End (SCALE). The panel consists of 18 internationally recognized key opinion leaders including clinicians, caregivers, medical researchers, legal experts, academicians, a medical writer, and leaders of professional organizations. The inaugural forum was held on April 4-6, 2008 in Chicago, IL, and was...
متن کامل